How Productive are Lame Duck Congresses?

LameDuck1
Pew Research
: “Our analysis found that lame duck sessions are shouldering more of the legislative workload than they used to. The last Congress’ lame duck, which stretched from November 2012 past New Year’s Day 2013, passed only 87 public laws, but that was 30.7% of the Congress’ entire two-year output and 31.3% of its substantive output (that is, excluding post-office renamings, National “fill-in-the-blank” Week designations and other purely ceremonial legislation). In 2010, the 99 public laws passed during the 111th Congress’ lame duck session accounted for 25.8% of all that Congress’ laws (and 29.2% of its substantive laws).”

“Those figures are up compared with recent history. Looking at the eight full lame duck sessions that were held between 1974 and 2008, on average they accounted for about 18% of the legislative output of their respective Congresses. (The sessions themselves averaged 30.25 calendar days, or 4% of a two-year congressional term, though legislative business wasn’t transacted on every day.)”

FavoriteLoadingSave to Favorites
  • Jonathan

    Rollcall – you should analyze how much money each congress member raises for each day they actually do work. It’s staggering for how little gets done. Who knows lame duck sessions may be more productive than non-lamb duck sessions. Wouldnt that be lame?

  • Jonathan

    Rollcall – you should analyze how much money each congress member raises for each day they actually do work. It’s staggering for how little gets done. Who knows lame duck sessions may be more productive than non-lamb duck sessions. Wouldnt that be lame?

Read previous post:
The Magic of ‘Organic’

The Atlantic: "The term 'organic' has developed a remarkably benevolent aura in the mind of the consumer." "After surveying 300...

Close